Comments on: Atom Don’t Get No Love from Intel http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/atom-dont-get-no-love-from-intel/ Mobility News, Reviews, and Views Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:49:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: ctitanic http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/atom-dont-get-no-love-from-intel/#comment-7039 ctitanic Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:58:48 +0000 http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/atom-dont-get-no-love-from-intel/#comment-7039 That does not surprice me at all! If you follow my posts in the last one I said almost the same thing. The best of the Atom has a performance close but not higher than the Celerom M at 900 MHz in my old Q1. And I´m happy to see that because the first generation of Atom was around 35% slower than that same Celeron M.

That does not surprice me at all! If you follow my posts in the last one I said almost the same thing. The best of the Atom has a performance close but not higher than the Celerom M at 900 MHz in my old Q1. And I´m happy to see that because the first generation of Atom was around 35% slower than that same Celeron M.

]]> By: John Walker http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/atom-dont-get-no-love-from-intel/#comment-7018 John Walker Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:38:12 +0000 http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/atom-dont-get-no-love-from-intel/#comment-7018 Wow, can't believe he actually said that. Well, I'm still looking forward to my MSI Wind...everything about it looks darn good. Wow, can’t believe he actually said that. Well, I’m still looking forward to my MSI Wind…everything about it looks darn good.

]]>