ScanLife: Proprietary vs. Open in the world of 2-D barcodes
Posted by Jay Donovan on 07/8/08 in barcodes
Saw this story at MobileCrunch regarding the ScanLife EZCode format and reader. You may have seen this type of code in Sprint advertisements lately.
In the grand tradition of UPC codes and CueCat
, ScanBuy/ScanLife
is attempting to barcode the world. Their mission: to allow companies and individuals to place small barcodes on their publications that are readable by over 70 phone models
including an upcoming application for the iPhone.
The 2d barcodes - meaning that unlike standard barcodes they are read in both the X and Y axis - can trigger menu events, download content, lead you to a website, or create a contact or calendar entry in your phone. They currently appear in outdoor ads, some magazines, as well as transit schedules in Europe. The program is actually compatible with multiple types of codes, ensuring international compatibility.
I installed this little app and scanned a few EZCodes out there and found that it works nicely (although it doesn’t seem to recognize my default mobile browser–Opera Mobile– and instead launches P.I.E. Dang!). After a little more experimentation however I noticed that it was not reading some other 2-D barcodes I had made in the past. (I have been using the i-nigma reader for a while to read QR and Data Matrix codes). I dug a little more and it seems that ScanLife uses a proprietary coding system that does not work with other "open" 2-D bar code standards.
Why? What is the difference? Why would there be multiple code types?
This article at mobilestance.com explains the angles pretty well.
What do I think? I agree with mobilestance that Android’s promise for spreading "open-ness" and pre-installation may prove to hold the ultimate check-mate. But it is really a matter of timing and the real winner, if this becomes a battle for standards, will be the company and code that creates the easiest scenario for the non-technically inclined person to use. After all, this technology is suppose to make things easier for us. The first company to simplify the entire procedure may not even have to show up to the chess game for standards (ugh, do you believe I posted such a cliche:)
Lastly, I did notice that codes created at mippin.com (which still resemble "open" QR codes) seem to work with both styles of code reader. Interesting.
Here are 3 examples to see the difference:
The first is a code created at mippin.com. The second is a QR code created at i-nigma.com and the third is a ScanLife EZCode. You can see the differences and similarities.












